sds:
I find it interesting that RHP’s lack of support for this law is based solely (at least in this post) on the fact that it’s impractical.
I agree it’s impractical, but my main problem is that the state has no business telling me what I can and cannot eat, nor what a restaurant can serve (beyond obviously poisonous or unsanitary foods).
Government: get your hands out of my stomach! It’s my body, right?
Actually, my argument wasn’t that it was impractical, but that it’s unhealthy. And the government already dictates what you eat through subsidies, unchecked monopolies by certain food companies, being paid off to say that unhealthy foods are healthy, etc., all which make certain foods cheaper and therefore more accessible.
If the government has no business at all in food, though, why have the government regulate for poisonous and unsanitary foods? Not only does the government have their hands on your stomach, they have their hands on business, which, as we all know, is far more important than the individual. Businesses could make much more money if they didn’t have to adhere to silly laws dictating sanitary facilities and safe ingredients, and that means cheaper food for everyone and bigger profits for business, which means more jobs and trickle-on-down money and so much more! Who cares if a few people die every so often from tainted food? It’s all worth it for the bottom line, amirite?!
Your argument was two-fold. First you mentioned the practical reason of the state not banning a substance that it also subsidizes. Secondly, you mentioned the health issue. But nice try.
Since I’m not a hardcore libertarian, I don’t really have a problem with government regulating issues of basic public safety and general welfare. But there’s a wide gulf (in my opinion) between forbidding companies from cooking with arsenic and banning salt in cooking, or soda drinks.
As for healthier ingredients, I think the market can regulate that best. Wal-Mart is starting to prominently sell organic foods, Progresso soup now has (some) MSG-free products, the salads at Wendy’s have romaine lettuce rather than iceberg, etc. Heck, Chipotle advertised for Food, Inc.
(I clearly stated my support for regulating poisons and unsanitary conditions. Hmmm, perhaps I should be indignant, too.)
fixed my markdown-to-HTML error. Of course corrupt individuals will seek government aid in gaining unfair advantage. To...
I actually agree with some of this, which makes me kind of nervous. ;) I gave Kellen this analogy once for why I oppose...
Your argument was two-fold. First you mentioned the practical reason of the state not banning a substance that it also...
Are you shitting me…